1962 DAF 750 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1612 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | 750 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3140 mm |
