1962 DAF 750 vs. 2004 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2004 Opel Meriva is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,686 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Opel Meriva (99 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Meriva weights approximately 736 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Opel Meriva (240 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2004 Opel Meriva | |
Make | DAF | Opel |
Model | 750 | Meriva |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1686 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 18.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2640 mm |