1962 DAF 750 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 696 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (208 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | 750 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 208 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1358 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2960 mm |