1962 DAF 750 vs. 2005 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Korando is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Korando (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 1203 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Korando (318 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 2005 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | DAF | SsangYong |
| Model | 750 | Korando |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2490 mm |
