1962 DAF 750 vs. 2006 Lancia Phedra
To start off, 2006 Lancia Phedra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Lancia Phedra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lancia Phedra (126 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lancia Phedra should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 1163 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lancia Phedra (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Lancia Phedra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 2006 Lancia Phedra | |
| Make | DAF | Lancia |
| Model | 750 | Phedra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 17.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
