1962 DAF 750 vs. 2007 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford C-MAX (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 760 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford C-MAX (166 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2007 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2007 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 750 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1962 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |