1962 DAF 750 vs. 2008 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Micra (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Micra weights approximately 430 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Micra (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2008 Nissan Micra | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | 750 | Micra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2440 mm |