1962 DAF 750 vs. 2009 Hyundai Atos
To start off, 2009 Hyundai Atos is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,086 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Hyundai Atos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hyundai Atos (58 HP @ 5450 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai Atos should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hyundai Atos weights approximately 396 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai Atos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hyundai Atos (83 Nm @ 2850 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Hyundai Atos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2009 Hyundai Atos | |
Make | DAF | Hyundai |
Model | 750 | Atos |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1086 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5450 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2850 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1058 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2390 mm |