1962 DAF 750 vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Patriot (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 2009 Jeep Patriot | |
| Make | DAF | Jeep |
| Model | 750 | Patriot |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
