1962 DAF 750 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 329 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.

Compare all specifications:

1962 DAF 750 2010 Holden Commodore
Make DAF Holden
Model 750 Commodore
Year Released 1962 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 746 cc 5976 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type boxer V
Horse Power 31 HP 360 HP
Torque 57 Nm 290 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]