1962 DAF 750 vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1962 DAF 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Tata Nano (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Tata Nano should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DAF 750 weights approximately 62 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 DAF 750 (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 DAF 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | DAF | Tata |
Model | 750 | Nano |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2230 mm |