1962 DAF 750 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 703 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy (250 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Caddy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2012 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | DAF | Volkswagen |
Model | 750 | Caddy |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 19.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2690 mm |