1962 DAF 750 vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (217 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1259 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (440 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | DAF | Volvo |
Model | 750 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 57 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2748 mm |