1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1962 DAF Daffodil is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 764 cc (2 cylinders), 1951 Saab 92 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 DAF Daffodil (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 DAF Daffodil should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Saab 92 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | DAF | Saab |
Model | Daffodil | 92 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2480 mm |