1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1955 Studebaker President State
To start off, 1962 DAF Daffodil is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker President State. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker President State would be higher. At 4,244 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Studebaker President State is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Studebaker President State (174 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Studebaker President State should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Studebaker President State weights approximately 885 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Studebaker President State (353 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 1955 Studebaker President State will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 1955 Studebaker President State | |
Make | DAF | Studebaker |
Model | Daffodil | President State |
Year Released | 1962 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 4244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3070 mm |