1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 1962 DAF Daffodil is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 763 cc (2 cylinders), 1956 Saab 92B is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Saab 92B weights approximately 120 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 1956 Saab 92B | |
| Make | DAF | Saab |
| Model | Daffodil | 92B |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2480 mm |
