1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 475 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | DAF | Sunbeam |
Model | Daffodil | Tiger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 27 L |