1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1962 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 26 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 DAF Daffodil (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 DAF Daffodil will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
| Make | DAF | Suzuki |
| Model | Daffodil | LJ 50 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1940 mm |
