1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1984 Zastava 750
To start off, 1984 Zastava 750 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Zastava 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Zastava 750 (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Zastava 750 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 25 kg more than 1984 Zastava 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Zastava 750 (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1984 Zastava 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 1984 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | DAF | Zastava |
| Model | Daffodil | 750 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1984 |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 55 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2010 mm |
