1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1996 Renault 19
To start off, 1996 Renault 19 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault 19 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault 19 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault 19 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Renault 19 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 1996 Renault 19 | |
| Make | DAF | Renault |
| Model | Daffodil | 19 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 55 L |
