1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1998 Ford Contour
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (195 HP @ 6625 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Contour weights approximately 746 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Contour (224 Nm @ 5625 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 1998 Ford Contour | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Contour |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6625 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5625 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 82.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 54 L |