1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1999 Lamborghini Diablo
To start off, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo (523 HP) has 497 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo (580 Nm) has 527 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 1999 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 1999 Lamborghini Diablo | |
| Make | DAF | Lamborghini |
| Model | Daffodil | Diablo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5707 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 523 HP |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 580 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 87.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 80 mm |
| Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 334 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |
