1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 1999 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 1999 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Suzuki Baleno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki Baleno (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Suzuki Baleno weights approximately 345 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Baleno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki Baleno (106 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1999 Suzuki Baleno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 1999 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | DAF | Suzuki |
Model | Daffodil | Baleno |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 51 L |