1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Hac is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,896 cc, 2000 Volkswagen Hac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volkswagen Hac weights approximately 666 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (310 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Hac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | DAF | Volkswagen |
Model | Daffodil | Hac |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1331 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2520 mm |