1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2001 Ford Puma
To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Puma weights approximately 370 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 2001 Ford Puma | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Puma |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 81.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 45 L |