1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 818 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | Daffodil | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1483 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 62 L |
