1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 1252 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | DAF | Mercury |
| Model | Daffodil | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1917 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 85 L |
