1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2005 Nissan Sentra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,505 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Sentra (175 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 564 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Sentra (237 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Sentra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | Daffodil | Sentra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2505 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1229 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 50 L |