1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2006 Hummer H3
To start off, 2006 Hummer H3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H3 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2006 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hummer H3 (306 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 2006 Hummer H3 | |
Make | DAF | Hummer |
Model | Daffodil | H3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2180 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 159 L |