1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2008 Subaru Forester is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Forester weights approximately 760 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2008 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Subaru Forester (320 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Subaru Forester | |
Make | DAF | Subaru |
Model | Daffodil | Forester |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 53 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 60 L |