1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2009 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2009 Infiniti FX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,019 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Infiniti FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Infiniti FX (390 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 364 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2009 Infiniti FX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Infiniti FX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Infiniti FX (501 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Infiniti FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF Daffodil | 2009 Infiniti FX | |
Make | DAF | Infiniti |
Model | Daffodil | FX |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5019 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 501 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 87.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 90 L |