1962 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2010 Toyota Aygo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 998 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Aygo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Aygo (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Aygo should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Aygo weights approximately 200 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Aygo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Aygo (93 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Aygo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Toyota Aygo | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | Daffodil | Aygo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 665 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3405 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1615 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 35 L |
