1962 DKW Junior vs. 1995 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 895 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (73 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Junior | 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | DKW | Jaguar |
| Model | Junior | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 968 Nm |
| Top Speed | 122 km/hour | 368 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
