1962 DKW Junior vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1962 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 710 kg more than 1962 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Mark II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Mark II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (64 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior. 2000 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 1962 DKW Junior has manual transmission. 1962 DKW Junior will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Junior | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Junior | Mark II |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 739 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 73 L |