1962 DKW Junior vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1962 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1962 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (73 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Junior | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | DKW | Rover |
Model | Junior | 75 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |