1962 DKW Junior vs. 2005 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2005 Samsung SM3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Samsung SM3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Samsung SM3 (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1962 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 464 kg more than 1962 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Samsung SM3 (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (73 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Samsung SM3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Junior | 2005 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | DKW | Samsung |
| Model | Junior | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2540 mm |
