1962 DKW Junior vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 2,985 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 2200 kg more than 1962 DKW Junior.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DKW Junior. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (73 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Junior | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Junior | Commander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 2985 cc |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 2900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 78 L |