1962 DKW Junior vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 3008 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1962 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Junior.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DKW Junior. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (73 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Junior | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | DKW | Peugeot |
| Model | Junior | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Top Speed | 122 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2613 mm |
