1962 DKW Munga vs. 1965 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 1965 Volkswagen 1600 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volkswagen 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Volkswagen 1600 (53 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Volkswagen 1600 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 135 kg more than 1965 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Volkswagen 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1965 Volkswagen 1600 | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | Munga | 1600 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 85.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 69 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |
