1962 DKW Munga vs. 1966 Fiat Dino
To start off, 1966 Fiat Dino is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,417 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat Dino (177 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Fiat Dino weights approximately 290 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Fiat Dino. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 1966 Fiat Dino | |
Make | DKW | Fiat |
Model | Munga | Dino |
Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 2417 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 92.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2560 mm |