1962 DKW Munga vs. 1966 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1966 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 9 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1966 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 2782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1119 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 56 L |
