1962 DKW Munga vs. 1966 Peugeot 204
To start off, 1966 Peugeot 204 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,129 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Peugeot 204 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Peugeot 204 (47 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Peugeot 204 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 230 kg more than 1966 Peugeot 204.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Peugeot 204. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1966 Peugeot 204 | |
| Make | DKW | Peugeot |
| Model | Munga | 204 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1129 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 64 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |
