1962 DKW Munga vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1968 ZAZ 966 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,196 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 336 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | DKW | ZAZ |
Model | Munga | 966 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2170 mm |