1962 DKW Munga vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1970 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (217 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 325 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 101.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |
