1962 DKW Munga vs. 1979 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1979 Ford Taunus is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Taunus (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 1979 Ford Taunus | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Taunus |
Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 94 L |