1962 DKW Munga vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 1982 Volvo 265 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 265 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 265 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | 265 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 2848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2660 mm |