1962 DKW Munga vs. 1983 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1983 Zastava 2101 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,196 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 2101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 150 kg more than 1983 Zastava 2101.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Zastava 2101. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 1983 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | DKW | Zastava |
Model | Munga | 2101 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2430 mm |