1962 DKW Munga vs. 1984 Rover 3500
To start off, 1984 Rover 3500 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Rover 3500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Rover 3500 (187 HP @ 5280 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Rover 3500 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Rover 3500 weights approximately 321 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Rover 3500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1984 Rover 3500 | |
| Make | DKW | Rover |
| Model | Munga | 3500 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5280 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1431 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 66 L |
