1962 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 605 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
