1962 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 1996 Ford Mondeo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mondeo (89 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 110 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Mondeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1996 Ford Mondeo | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Mondeo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 61 L |
